So who reigned victorious in the battle for SharePoint
upgrade supremacy? Oh silly reader, of
course you have to wait until the END of this article to find out who won the
war of "To Upgrade or Not to Upgrade"
waged by SharePoint experts Joel Oleson and Mark Miller.
To begin, let's introduce the teams. In Joel's corner was a venerable list of
industry experts in favor of upgrading to SharePoint 2013 whose names you're
sure to recognize: Naomi Moneypenny, CTO at Synxi; Jason Himmelstein, Senior
Technology Director for SharePoint at Atrion; and Benjamin Niaulin, SharePoint
MVP and SharePoint Specialist for GSoft.
Not to be outdone, Mark likewise compiled a collection of heavy-hitters
to argue the case for sticking to your current platform including Chris Beckett,
a Microsoft Certified Master and Virgil Carroll, Owner and CEO of High Monkey
With the teams established and the strong scent of
competition in the air, both sides took turns commanding the stage with their
diametrically opposed opinions on whether or not your organization should
upgrade to SharePoint 2013. For Jason,
the argument for upgrading was simple and straightforward; just because you
have something that works, doesn't necessarily make it the best. For example, do you think that this blogger
got to SPTechCon by riding her bike with her Sony Walkman jamming out tunes and
10-pound "portable" phone in tow? Of
course not! I hopped on a plane with my
2.38-pound MacBook Air, Bluetooth headphones, and iPhone and cruised on up from
D.C. to Boston. Clearly, technology has
changed in the last so many years and it's up to us to rethink the way we get
business done to meet the needs of new technologies and devices. As Jason noted, whether we like it or not,
people are using different browsers and mobile devices. It's up to us as IT professionals to make
sure that we are adapting to meet the needs of our business users and ensuring
that business is getting done better, faster, and cheaper.
So sure, we may be bulking up on new, shiny gadgets with all
the bells and whistles, but what about all the investments we've already
made? As Chris noted, given how much
SharePoint improved from 2007 to 2010, many organizations have already
made deep investments in our SharePoint 2010 environments. So why on earth would we shelve everything
we've already invested in and lose all of our ROI? The true goal of an organization, as Chris
pointed out, should be to recognize a value and positive ROI when you have
it. With all the valuable SharePoint maturity
and business productivity we've gained from upgrading to SharePoint 2010, what
would we REALLY be gaining from flipping the script and switching to 2013? In Chris' opinion, not much unfortunately.
Investment. Money, money,
money. To counter Chris, Ben examined
what the REAL financial costs are to upgrade to SharePoint 2013. Surprisingly, contrary to popular belief, the
investment is nowhere near as explosive as one may think. In fact, when looking at the cost sheet, you
may notice something you never realized…. SharePoint 2013 OOTB actually costs
LESS than 2010. Not only that, but when
you do a side-by-side comparison of SharePoint 2010 to 2013, with all the added
features you gain from 2013, such as improved search, mobile, and social, you
really are getting more for less.
While Team Joel may have touted all the new and improved
features available for SharePoint 2013, Virgil from Team Mark had a differing
view of what more features really means.
As great as having all these new features may seem, without the
resources on hand to see that these new features are implemented and adapted by
the end users, they are pretty much worthless.
When it comes to most businesses, unfortunately, we don't tend to have
the training available to introduce these features to the masses. Newsfeed, blogs, communities? Sure, these things are great and all, but
just how practical are they if no one is using them? The fact of the matter, according to Virgil,
is that for the most part, we simply don't have the SharePoint staff available
to support all these new changes.
So what about our end users?
That's what Naomi wanted to know.
When it comes to 2013, all these features that Virgil poo-pooed, Naomi
had a definite opposing viewpoint to argue.
Sure, social isn't going to be adopted overnight, but just look at all the
user-friendly options that have been implemented for SharePoint 2013. With the ability to follow people, documents, and even sites, social collaboration and business productivity has never been easier
to achieve. Once we've made it easier
for users to get the information they need, when they need it, the benefits are
countless, and include increased employee engagement as well as reduced strain on
our IT departments.
You say that we've increased productivity, but "can you
QUANTIFY that?," wondered Chris. While we
keep talking about impacted productivity, Chris noticed that there is a real
lack of business proof that demonstrates that productivity has really increased
that dramatically with all these new improvements to 2013. As great as 2013 may seem to Team Joel, many
are finding that users are getting the same ROI from 2010 as they are from
Not to be outdone, Joel reminded the audience that by
sticking to SharePoint 2010 and avoiding upgrading, all we are doing is
sticking to a stalled attitude of "I GUESS this is good enough." One of the inherent problems to SharePoint
2010 is that there's no excitement surrounding it. So how then do we get our business users
excited? The answer is simple: STOP
pushing what's old and start using what's new and has been improved to give
users a positive business experience.
As you can probably tell by now, the arguments for both
sides are commendable. So how do you
choose a side? In their closing remarks,
representatives from both teams summed up their key points and fought to earn
the audience's vote. So why upgrade to
SharePoint 2013? According to Team Joel,
the answer should be clear:
2013 isn't just about adding features; it's
about adding value and capabilities as well as increasing productivity and
When we supply our end users with increased
features and functionality, we are improving their ability to get work done, thereby providing them with the tools they need to gain a competitive advantage
in the marketplace.
While SharePoint 2010 provides a commendable
platform, it just doesn't provide the opportunities that 2013 does. By not upgrading, you are choosing to miss
out on a lot of business value and positive ROI.
At the end of the day, our business decisions
should be based on our users. When it
comes to upgrading to SharePoint 2013, we are successfully allowing our users
to learn, perform, and accomplish more in less time.
All great arguments, but what says Team Mark? When it comes to opting to not upgrade to
SharePoint 2013, the list of arguments is equally compelling and include:
What are you REALLY gaining by upgrading? SharePoint 2010 is a powerful platform on its
own and provides a wealth of features and capabilities. So why spend valuable time and money changing
something that already performs great within an organization?
With Microsoft's focus on Office365 and online,
SharePoint 2013 doesn't really provide all the bells and whistles that it may
seem to. With the introduction of
Yammer, the "cloud" and more, what does SharePoint 2013 provide? It seems that everything that is "new" has
been moved OUTSIDE of SharePoint.
Upgrading to SharePoint 2013 shouldn't be about
doing what's new and cool and trendy, it should be about what's right for YOUR
business. Before you jump on the
bandwagon, think about the investment and what goes into upgrading. You may find that when you weigh out the pros
and cons, that the business justification for upgrading simply isn't there.
So who do YOU think won the argument? After hearing both sides, this blogger has to
admit that I think the battle ended in a draw.
Before you accuse me of copping out, hear me out… SharePoint, regardless
if you have 2013, 2010, or heck, even 2003 or 2007, is a powerful platform. There is a lot that it can and cannot
accomplish from knowledge management to document management to social
collaboration and more. When it comes to
deciding which version you should be using and whether or not to upgrade, the most
important thing you should be looking at is your business and what's right for
YOU. Every organization is different and
therefore has different needs, requirements, and objectives. For some small companies, for example, newsfeeds
and community message boards may be completely useless – if your company only
has 10 employees and they are all in the same office on a daily basis, you
probably don't require all the fancy social outreach tools included in
SharePoint 2013. On the other hand, if you
have a global organization with offices scattered across the world, discussion
boards and communities can be the ticket to getting the answers you need from a
variety of qualified sources.
Though just one example, clearly there are many instances
where an organization may or may not need to upgrade their SharePoint
environment. At the end of the day, it's
up to you to look from the inside out and to decide what YOUR organization needs in order to perform
the best it can.
Check out our complete coverage of SPTechCon 2013 from
2013: Jeremy Thake's Keynote Shows You the Future of Social Collaboration
2013: Heather Solomon & Dustin Miller are Bringing Sexy Back to SharePoint
with the SharePoint Experience
2013: Day Two – One Cup of Coffee Down, Many More to Go!
2013: Mark Miller Helps You Figure out "What's Your Story?"
2013: Joel Oleson Explores the "Art of the Possible" with SharePoint
2013 and Enterprise Mobile
2013: The Best SharePoint Training, Classes, and Tutorials Have Arrived in